Chapter 19: The Resurrection of Christ

The resurrection of Christ stands as the pulsating heart of Christian faith—an event unparalleled in its theological force and historical consequence. It is not merely a return from death, but the vindication of Jesus’ divine identity, the foundation of the apostolic witness, and the birth cry of the Church. Every Sunday’s celebration, every martyr’s courage, every disciple’s proclamation draws its life from that empty tomb. The resurrection is not a private vision nor a theological metaphor, but the decisive intervention of the Living God into history—breaking the chains of death, transforming despair into faith, and inaugurating the kingdom of eternal life.

The Cornerstone of Faith

The resurrection of Jesus Christ is reported with unanimous voice across the four canonical Gospels, affirmed with fervor in the apostolic epistles, embraced throughout the universal Church, and commemorated weekly on the Lord’s Day. It is not treated as myth or legend, but as the crowning miracle of Christ’s earthly ministry—a divine attestation of His person and work, and the irreplaceable cornerstone of Christian hope. It serves as both the pledge of the believer’s future resurrection and the indestructible anchor of their salvation.

The New Testament attributes this miracle jointly to the omnipotent will of God the Father and the authority of the Son Himself. According to Acts 2:24 and Romans 6:4, God raised His Son from the dead. Yet Jesus also declared, “I lay down my life… I have power to take it again” (John 10:17–18), affirming His sovereignty even in death. This paradox—death conquered through divine-human synergy—gives the resurrection its majestic weight.

Resurrection and Ascension: A Divine Continuum

The resurrection is incomplete without the ascension. The risen life of the Savior could not descend again into mortality; it necessarily culminated in glorification. St. Paul declares, “Christ being raised from the dead dies no more; death has no more dominion over Him” (Romans 6:9). A temporary reprieve from death would have only prolonged the tragedy of the cross. Instead, Christ’s resurrection is an eternal victory, inaugurating His reign at the right hand of the Father.

The Church Born from an Empty Tomb

Christianity is not a philosophy built on ideals, nor a religion founded on abstractions, but a proclamation of a living Person. Without the resurrection, the Church would have been stillborn—its message silenced in the despair of Good Friday. The apostles, bereft of hope after the crucifixion, were transformed by an encounter so real and so revolutionary that it turned cowards into martyrs and skeptics into saints. The very existence of the Church is testimony to the risen Lord.

As Paul argues in 1 Corinthians 15, if Christ has not been raised, then preaching is empty, faith is futile, sins remain unforgiven, and death is unconquered. The cross, apart from the resurrection, is a defeat; with the resurrection, it becomes the fountain of redemption.

A Turning Point in History

The resurrection is the watershed between despair and hope. It is the divine pivot upon which all of redemptive history turns. Christ’s prediction of His death and resurrection was not fully grasped by His disciples until after the event. Their Messianic expectations—political, immediate, and earthly—were shattered by the horror of the cross. They were left disillusioned, disoriented, and defenseless. Yet within days, the same men who had fled in fear now stood boldly proclaiming the risen Christ.

This psychological and spiritual transformation cannot be explained away as a collective fantasy or religious wish-fulfillment. Their courage endured persecution, exile, and death itself. The transformation reached even Saul of Tarsus—Christianity’s fiercest enemy—who became its most impassioned herald.

Four Theories Considered

The historical reality of the resurrection has been challenged, and alternative theories have emerged across the centuries. But each theory collapses under the weight of its own inconsistencies or implausibility.

1. The Historical View: This view, held by the universal Church, asserts the bodily resurrection as a real, miraculous event, in continuity with Christ’s life and teachings. For forty days, Jesus appeared to His disciples in various places and circumstances—not as a phantom, but as one bearing the marks of crucifixion and yet gloriously transformed. He walked, talked, ate, and instructed, before ascending to heaven. The purpose of these appearances was not only personal reassurance, but apostolic commissioning.

While variations exist in the Gospel accounts, these differences underscore authenticity rather than contradiction. The harmonization is difficult, yes—but the central event is clear, consistent, and life-altering. The apostolic faith was no hallucination. The disciples’ sudden return to Jerusalem, their defiance of the Sanhedrin, and the founding of the Church in the very city where Christ had died are inexplicable apart from their unshakable conviction that “He is risen indeed.”

2. The Theory of Fraud: According to this notion, the disciples stole the body of Jesus and conspired to deceive the world. But this slanderous theory, first circulated by Christ’s enemies, refutes itself. Roman guards, stationed at the tomb, would not have allowed such a theft. The disciples were not psychologically capable of such a deception—they were demoralized and scattered. Moreover, liars do not die for what they know to be false. The fraud theory is an insult to history and human dignity.

3. The Swoon Theory: This hypothesis claims that Jesus did not die but merely fainted, revived in the cool of the tomb, and escaped. Yet how could a man tortured by crucifixion, pierced through the heart, and encased in burial wrappings summon the strength to roll away the stone, overpower guards, and inspire reverent awe? A feeble, dying man would not birth a movement of world-transforming joy. As Strauss himself admitted, this theory reduces the risen Christ to a pathetic figure—too weak to inspire, too human to worship.

4. The Vision Theory: This idea supposes that the resurrection was not physical but psychological—an inner experience mistaken for outward reality. It attributes the appearances to hallucinations born of grief. Yet such a claim demands the suspension of reason. It requires belief that multiple individuals, in different settings, over forty days, had the same hallucination—and that this shared delusion produced the moral energy that launched the Christian faith.

The vision theory cannot account for the empty tomb. It cannot explain the cessation of appearances after the ascension. It cannot describe how skeptics like Thomas or enemies like Paul became believers. Nor can it explain why the disciples’ belief, once formed, was never reversed.

Modern Concessions from Critics

Even among liberal theologians and skeptical historians, the resurrection’s impact is acknowledged. Baur, the formidable critic of Tübingen, conceded that only the resurrection could have reversed the despair of the disciples and created the Church. Ewald, though denying bodily resurrection, confessed that the historical certainty of Christ’s reappearance stands firmer than any other event. Keim recognized that no natural theory adequately explains the rise of resurrection faith. Schenkel eventually admitted that the question defies rational explanation—but affirmed that the faith of the apostles in the risen Christ is one of history’s most indestructible facts.

In the end, the weight of evidence returns us to the apostolic testimony: “We have seen the Lord.” Before this confession, all alternatives pale. If Christ is not risen, then Christianity is a glorious illusion. But if He is risen, then life, death, and the world itself are forever changed.

This entry was posted in 1. Apostolic Era (30-100 AD). Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.